Machine Learning in Environmental Metagenomic Approaches: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis: Machine Learning in Environmental Metagenomic Approaches: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis

Sevtap TIRINK

Yazarlar

Sevtap TIRINK Igdir University, Health Services Vocational School, Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Environmental Health Program, TR76000, Igdir, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23139868

Anahtar Kelimeler:

environmental metagenomics- machine learning- science mapping- microbial ecology- bibliometrics

Özet

Machine learning is increasingly integrated with metagenomic analysis, yet the development, conceptual organization, environmental applications, and recent thematic directions of this research area require systematic characterization. This study examined English-language article and review records indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2016 to 2025 using a predefined search strategy. In this study, bibliometric and science-mapping analyses were conducted to examine annual scientific production, source productivity, keyword co-occurrence, thematic structure, trend topics, and geographic and collaboration patterns. The analysis covered 286 documents published across 139 sources, with an annual growth rate of 54.79%, and publication output reached 102 documents in 2025. Metagenomics and machine learning formed major conceptual foundations, with the thematic structure linking computational methods to microbial ecology, diversity, soil, and bacterial communities. Keyword co-occurrence further distinguished interconnected groupings centered on machine learning–metagenomics–bioinformatics, soil–rhizosphere and nutrient-related research, bioremediation–biodegradation, and resistome–wastewater surveillance. Recent trend topics included artificial intelligence, prediction, and degradation. When considered together with the thematic-map position of degradation–bioremediation–artificial intelligence, these patterns support a cautious interpretation that this research direction is recently gaining visibility rather than representing a definitively emerging or dominant research front. Scientific production was geographically concentrated, particularly in China and the United States, while international collaboration was also evident. Overall, the field shows increasing methodological diversity, with reference-based approaches being complemented by predictive and explainable methods.

Referanslar

Abdelwahab, S. I., Taha, M. M. E., Jerah, A. A., Farasani, A., Abdullah, S. M., Aljahdali, I. A., Ibrahim, R., Oraibi, O., Oraibi, B., Alfaifi, H. A., Alzahrani, A. H., & Babiker, Y. O. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence and microbiome research: Evolution of hotspots, research trends, and thematic-based narrative review. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 70(10), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2024.70.10.24

Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2026). Science Mapping Analysis - A primer with Biblioshiny. McGraw-Hill , ISBN: 978-88-386-2297-7.

Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C., D'Aniello, L., & Spano, M. (2026). Biblioshiny and the SAAS Workflow: An integrated framework for transparent and reproducible science mapping. A demonstration through the replication of a study. Journal of Informetrics, 20(3), 101837 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2026.101837

Bahram, M., Hildebrand, F., Forslund, S. K., Anderson, J. L., Soudzilovskaia, N. A., Bodegom, P. M., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Anslan, S., Coelho, L. P., Harend, H., Huerta-Cepas, J., Medema, M. H., Maltz, M. R., Mundra, S., Olsson, P. A., Pent, M., Põlme, S., Sunagawa, S., Ryberg, M., … Bork, P. (2018). Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature, 560(7717), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6

Böke Özkoç, H., Tırınk, S., & Farooq Tayeb Alsaadawi, S. (2025). Metagenomic approaches to monitoring and management of potential toxic element pollution. UBAK Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17939033

Chettri, D., Verma, A. K., Chirania, M., & Verma, A. K. (2024). Metagenomic approaches in bioremediation of environmental pollutants. Environmental Pollution, 363, 125297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125297

Cordier, T., Alonso-Sáez, L., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L., Aylagas, E., Bohan, D. A., Bouchez, A., Chariton, A. A., Creer, S., Frühe, L., Keck, F., Keeley, N., Laroche, O., Leese, F., Pochon, X., Stoeck, T., Pawlowski, J., & Lanzén, A. (2021). Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: A review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap. Molecular Ecology, 30(13), 2937–2958. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15472

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Farooq Tayeb Alsaadawi, S., Tırınk, S., & Böke Özkoç, H. (2026). Integrating metagenomic functional profiling to evaluate public health risks derived from PTE-contaminated river sediments. In International Congress on Natural Sciences and Applied Mathematics (pp. 259–275). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19459760

Gardiner, L., Marshall, M., Reusch, K., Dearden, C., Birmingham, M., Carrieri, A. P., Pyzer-Knapp, E. O., Krishna, R., Neal, Andy (2024) DGCNN approach links metagenome-derived taxon and functional information providing insight into global soil organic carbon. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes, 10. p. 113. 10.1038/s41522-024-00583-9

Ghannam, R. B., & Techtmann, S. M. (2021). Machine learning applications in microbial ecology, human microbiome studies, and environmental monitoring. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 19, 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.028

Grossart, H. P., Massana, R., McMahon, K. D., & Walsh, D. A. (2020). Linking metagenomics to aquatic microbial ecology and biogeochemical cycles. Limnology and Oceanography, 65(S1), S2–S20. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11382

Herazo-Álvarez, J., Mora, M., Cuadros-Orellana, S., Vilches-Ponce, K., & Hernández-García, R. (2025). A review of neural networks for metagenomic binning. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 26(2), bbaf065. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaf065

Jansson, J. K., & Hofmockel, K. S. (2018). The soil microbiome—from metagenomics to metaphenomics. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 43, 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2018.01.013

Liu, S., Rodriguez, J. S., Munteanu, V., Ronkowski, C., Sharma, N. K., Alser, M., ... & Mangul, S. (2025). Analysis of metagenomic data. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 5, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-024-00376-6

Marcos-Zambrano, L. J., Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic, K., Loncar Turukalo, T., Przymus, P., Trajkovik, V., Aasmets, O., Berland, M., Gruca, A., Hasic, J., Hron, K., Klammsteiner, T., Kolev, M., Lahti, L., Lopes, M. B., Moreno, V., Naskinova, I., Org, E., Paciência, I., Papoutsoglou, G., … Truu, J. (2021). Applications of machine learning in human microbiome studies: A review on feature selection, biomarker identification, disease prediction and treatment. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 634511. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.634511

Mathieu, A., Leclercq, M., Sanabria, M., Perin, O., & Droit, A. (2022). Machine learning and deep learning applications in metagenomic taxonomy and functional annotation. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 811495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.811495

Mirete, S., Sánchez-Costa, M., González-de-Figueras, C., Díaz-Rullo, J., Martínez-Rodríguez, P., & González-Pastor, J. E. (2025). Metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs): Advances, challenges, and ecological insights. Microorganisms, 13(5), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13050985

Pallavi, H., & Uday Bhaskar, N. (2025). Computational and machine learning frameworks for microbial data analysis: A systematic review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 16(6), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v16i6.7377

Papoutsoglou, G., Tarazona, S., Lopes, M. B., Klammsteiner, T., Ibrahimi, E., Eckenberger, J., Novielli, P., Tonda, A., Simeon, A., Shigdel, R., Béreux, S., Vitali, G., Tangaro, S., Lahti, L., Temko, A., Claesson, M. J., & Berland, M. (2023). Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1261889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261889

R Core Team (2026). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.R-project.org/.

Roy, G., Prifti, E., Belda, E., & Zucker, J.-D. (2024). Deep learning methods in metagenomics: A review. Microbial Genomics, 10(4), 001231. https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001231

Sharma, S., Narahari, H. P., & Raman, K. (2025). Harnessing machine learning for metagenomic data analysis: Trends and applications. mSystems, 10(11), e01642-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01642-24

Tonkovic, P., Kalajdziski, S., Zdravevski, E., Lameski, P., Corizzo, R., Pires, I. M., Garcia, N. M., Loncar-Turukalo, T., & Trajkovik, V. (2020). Literature on applied machine learning in metagenomic classification: A scoping review. Biology, 9(12), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9120453

Velasco Cardona, D. C., Cardona-Acevedo, S., Valencia-Arias, A., Pérez-Delgado, O., & Pinella Vega, M. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence techniques in bacteriology: A PRISMA-guided research agenda. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, 1641967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1641967

Wassan, J. T., Wang, H., Browne, F., & Zheng, H. (2019). A comprehensive study on predicting functional role of metagenomes using machine learning methods. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 16(3), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2018.2858808

Wijaya, J., Park, J., Yang, Y., Siddiqui, S. I., & Oh, S. (2024). A metagenome-derived artificial intelligence modeling framework advances the predictive diagnosis and interpretation of petroleum-polluted groundwater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 472, 134513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134513

Xu, D., Liu, B., Wang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence for biotechnology and applied microbiology: Exploring research hotspots and frontiers. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 998298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.998298

Zhang, L., Chen, F., Zeng, Z., Xu, M., Sun, F., Yang, L., Bi, X., Lin, Y., Gao, Y., Hao, H., Yi, W., Li, M., & Xie, Y. (2021). Advances in metagenomics and its application in environmental microorganisms. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 766364. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.766364

Zhu, Z., Ding, J., Du, R., Zhang, Z., Guo, J., Li, X., Jiang, L., Chen, G., Bu, Q., Tang, N., Lu, L., Gao, X., Li, W., Li, S., Zeng, G., & Liang, J. (2024). Systematic tracking of nitrogen sources in complex river catchments: Machine learning approach based on microbial metagenomics. Water Research, 253, 121255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121255

Machine Learning in Environmental Metagenomic Approaches: A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis