Veri Okuryazarlığından Yapay Zekâya: Dijital Çağın Eleştirel Yetkinlikleri Üzerine Bir Derleme

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18213721

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Bilgi okuryazarlığı- Veri okuryazarlığı- Yapay zeka okuryazarlığı- Bilgiye erişim sistemleri

Özet

Bu derleme çalışması, 2010–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanan akademik literatür ışığında veri okuryazarlığı ile yapay zekâ (YZ) okuryazarlığı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, bu iki kavramın kesişim noktalarını, birbirini nasıl tamamladığını ve dijital çağda bireyler ile kurumlar için taşıdığı önemi analiz etmektir. Dijitalleşmenin hız kazandığı günümüzde, bireylerin ve kurumların veriye dayalı karar alma, algoritmik sistemleri anlama ve etik farkındalık geliştirme becerileri, hem veri okuryazarlığı hem de yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı kavramlarının kapsamını genişletmiştir. Çalışma, özellikle eğitim ortamlarında ve kullanıcı odaklı YZ uygulamalarında bu iki kavramın etkileşimlerini değerlendirmektedir. Literatürde yapay zekâ okuryazarlığının yalnızca teknik bilgi ile sınırlı olmadığı; aynı zamanda eleştirel düşünme, etik duyarlılık ve şeffaflık gibi becerileri de kapsadığı görülmektedir. Ayrıca yapay zekâ sistemlerinin çıktılarının doğru anlaşılabilmesi ve güvenli biçimde kullanılabilmesi için bireylerin güçlü bir veri okuryazarlığına sahip olmaları gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Çalışma, YZ çağında bireylerin ve toplumların dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin artırılması için bütüncül eğitim politikalarına ve ölçme araçlarına duyulan ihtiyacı ortaya koymaktadır.

Referanslar

Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Lee, H. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019–2023). Computers and Education Open, 6, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173

Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Calzada Prado, J., & Marzal, M. Á. (2013). Incorporating data literacy into information literacy programs: Core competencies and contents. Libri, 63(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0009

Carlson, J., Fosmire, M., Miller, C., & Nelson, M. S. (2011). Determining data information literacy needs: A study of students and research faculty. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 629–657. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0022

DataCamp. (2025). The state of data & AI literacy report 2025. https://www.datacamp.com/blog/introducing-the-state-of-data-and-ai-literacy-report-2025

Dhar, V. (2013). Data science and prediction. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500499

D'Ignazio, C. (2017). Creative data literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots. Information Design Journal, 23(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.23.1.03dig

Digital Promise. (2024, June 18). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate, and use emerging technology. https://digitalpromise.org/2024/06/18/ai-literacy-a-framework-to-understand-evaluate-and-use-emerging-technology/

Druga, S., Williams, R., Breazeal, C., & Resnick, M. (2017). “Hey Google is it ok if I eat you?" Initial explorations in child-agent interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 595–600). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079753

Ebeling, J., Koch, H., & Roth-Grigori, A. (2021). Data literacy education an deutschen Hochschulen: Kompetenzen im kritischen Umgang mit Daten. Stifterverband.

Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., Hamilton, K., & Sandvig, C. (2015). "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 153–162). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702154

Eslami, M., Vaccaro, K., Lee, M. K., Elazari Bar On, A., Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2019). User attitudes towards algorithmic opacity and transparency in online reviewing platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–14). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300835

Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10635

Google. (2024). Advancing education using Google AI. Google for Education. https://edu.google.com/intl/ALL_us/ai/education/

Gu, X., & Ericson, B. J. (2025). AI literacy in K-12 and higher education in the wake of generative AI: An integrative review (arXiv:2503.00079). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.00079

Gunning, D. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

Kahn, K., & Winters, N. (2017). Child-friendly programming interfaces to AI cloud services. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2017) (pp. 566–570). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_52

Lintner, T. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning, 9(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00262-1

Lo, L. S. (2024). Evaluating AI literacy in academic libraries: A survey study with a focus on US employees. College & Research Libraries, 85(5), 635. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.5.635

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Microsoft. (2024). AI in education: A Microsoft special report. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/education/msdownloads/AI-in-Education-A-Microsoft-Special-Report.pdf

Mills, K., Ruiz, P., Lee, K. W., Coenraad, M., Fusco, J., Roschelle, J., & Weisgrau, J. (2024). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate, and use emerging technology. Institute of Educational Sciences.

Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Towards a school-based ‘critical data education’. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1739278

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.

Pinski, M., & Benlian, A. (2024). AI literacy for users–A comprehensive review and future research directions of learning methods, components, and effects. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100062

Shapiro, R. B., Fiebrink, R., & Norvig, P. (2018). How machine learning impacts the undergraduate computing curriculum. Communications of the ACM, 61(11), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274241

Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Kamar, E., & Kraus, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: The one hundred year study on artificial intelligence (arXiv:2211.06318). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.06318

Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI? Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 9795–9799. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019652

Yim, I. H. Y. (2024). A critical review of teaching and learning artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Developing an intelligence-based AI literacy framework for primary school education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100319

Zimmerman, M. (2018). Teaching AI: Exploring new frontiers for learning. International Society for Technology in Education.

Yayınlanmış

2025-06-15

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

DAYAN, E. (2025). Veri Okuryazarlığından Yapay Zekâya: Dijital Çağın Eleştirel Yetkinlikleri Üzerine Bir Derleme. Black Sea Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18213721