Livestock Under Scrutiny: Interpreting Emissions, Water, and Land Metrics in Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21397218Keywords:
Animal production, Climate change, Veterinary medicine, Sustainability, Efficiency, Greenhouse gas emissionAbstract
A growing global population and finite natural resources have intensified debate over the environmental sustainability of food production systems. Within this landscape, the livestock sector is frequently criticized based on greenhouse gas emissions, water footprint, and land use; yet these assessments often involve methodological inconsistencies and comparisons detached from biophysical context. This review re-examines common claims directed at livestock by drawing on the scientific literature and by placing sectoral impacts within a data-driven framework. The composition and origins of livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions are discussed, and the core distinction between the biogenic methane cycle and fossil fuel-derived carbon emissions is emphasized. Water footprint debates are addressed through the green, blue, and grey water taxonomy, highlighting that a substantial share of water associated with livestock production derives from precipitation rather than from withdrawals that directly compete with domestic or industrial demand. From a land-use perspective, attention is given to ruminants’ capacity to utilize grasslands and rangelands that are largely unsuitable for cropping, as well as to the potential for carbon sequestration under well-managed grazing systems. This narrative review draws on literature published between 2006 and 2025, prioritizing both foundational references and recent advances in methane accounting, emissions-intensity frameworks, and mitigation strategies. Evidence indicates that interventions including productivity gains, herd health and reproductive management, reproductive biotechnologies, feed technologies, manure management, and biogas production can meaningfully reduce emissions intensity without constraining output. Collectively, the findings suggest that mitigation priorities should focus less on restricting livestock per se and more on reducing dependence on fossil fuels while scaling scientifically grounded practices within livestock systems. A livestock sector managed on scientific principles may contribute to global food security and, under appropriate governance and practice, form part of a credible climate mitigation portfolio.
References
Allen, M. R., Shine, K. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Millar, R. J., Cain, M., Frame, D. J., & Macey, A. H. (2018). A solution to the misrepresentation of methane’s role in global warming. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8
Beauchemin, K. A., Kreuzer, M., O’Mara, F., & McAllister, T. A. (2008). Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 48(2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07199
Bouwman, A. F., Boumans, L. J. M., & Batjes, N. H. (2002). Emissions of N₂O and NO from fertilized fields: Summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16(4), Article 1058. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001811
Capper, J. L., Cady, R. A., & Bauman, D. E. (2009). The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science, 87(6), 2160–2167. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1781
Conant, R. T., Paustian, K., & Elliott, E. T. (2001). Grassland management and conversion into grassland: Effects on soil carbon. Ecological Applications, 11(2), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0343:GMACIG]2.0.CO;2
Correddu, F., Lunesu, M. F., Sechi, S., Caratzu, M. F., & Pulina, G. (2025). CO2 removal to reach net zero warming of global methane and nitrous oxide emissions of livestock: Comparison of two metrics under different 2050 FAO scenarios. PLOS ONE, 20(8), Article e0330379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330379
Elmadfa, I., & Meyer, A. L. (2017). Animal proteins as important contributors to a healthy human diet. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 5(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022943
Fernstrom, J. D. (1994). Dietary amino acids and brain function. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 94(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8223(94)92045-1
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/a0701e/a0701e.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock sector: A life cycle assessment. FAO Animal Production and Health Division. https://www.fao.org/4/i3461e/i3461e.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018). World livestock: Transforming the livestock sector through the Sustainable Development Goals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i8384en/I8384EN.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2025). FAOSTAT statistical database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/OA
Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock: A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/i3437e/i3437e.pdf
Gerber, P. J., Vellinga, T., Opio, C., Henderson, B., & Steinfeld, H. (2011). Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science, 139(1–2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.012
Heinke, J., Lannerstad, M., Gerten, D., Havlík, P., Herrero, M., Notenbaert, A. M. O., ... Müller, C. (2020). Water use in global livestock production—opportunities and constraints for increasing water productivity. Water Resources Research, 56(12), Article e2019WR026995.
Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M. C., Thornton, P. K., & Obersteiner, M. (2013). Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52), 20888–20893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308149110
Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P. K., Conant, R. T., Smith, P., & Stehfest, E. (2016). Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change, 6(5), 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2925
Hristov, A. N. (2023). Perspective: Could dairy cow nutrition meaningfully reduce the carbon footprint of milk production? Journal of Dairy Science, 106(11), 7336–7340. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23395
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Firkins, J. L., Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., & Tricarico, J. M. (2013). Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science, 91(11), 5045–5069.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995). Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 73(8), 2483–2492. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382483x
Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396
McSherry, M. E., & Ritchie, M. E. (2013). Effects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: A global review. Global Change Biology, 19(5), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12144
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems, 15(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8
Mitloehner, F. M. (2021). Livestock’s role in climate change: A critical review. Animal Frontiers, 11(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfaa064
Mitloehner, F. M., & Calvo-Lorenzo, M. S. (2020). Overcoming misinformation on the role of livestock in climate change. Animal Frontiers, 10(4), 67–74.
Montes, F., Meinen, R., Dell, C., Rotz, A., Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., & Oenema, O. (2013). Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science, 91(11), 5070–5094. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6585
Mottet, A., de Haan, C., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., Opio, C., & Gerber, P. (2017). Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001
Pitesky, M. E., Stackhouse, K. R., & Mitloehner, F. M. (2009). Clearing the air: Livestock’s contribution to climate change. Advances in Agronomy, 103, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(09)03001-6
Schyns, J. F., Booij, M. J., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2019). The water footprint of wood for energy consumed in the European Union. Water Resources and Industry, 17, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2019.100115
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., & Smith, J. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1492), 789–813.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s contribution to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 142(2–4), 159–
Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2853–2867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2023). National inventory submissions 2023. UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/ghg-inventories-annex-i-parties/2023
Victor, D. G., Geels, F. W., & Sharpe, S. (2019). Accelerating the low carbon transition. Energy Policy, 133, Article 110981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.030
Wilkinson, J. M. (2011). Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal, 5(7), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111100005X
Wu, G. (2016). Dietary protein intake and human health. Food & Function, 7(3), 1251–1265.
Yalcinkaya, S. (2024). Spatiotemporal analysis and mitigation potential of GHG emissions from the livestock sector in Turkey. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 105, Article 107441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107441
Zonderland-Thomassen, M. A., Lieffering, M., & Ledgard, S. F. (2014). Water footprint of beef cattle and sheep produced in New Zealand: Water scarcity and eutrophication impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73, 253–262.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Black Sea Journal of Environmental Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.